image description
Pittsfield resident Carolyn Sibner says the real crime is 'GE used our river like a trash can for decades' at Wednesday's cleanup information meeting.

EPA Lays Out Draft Plan for PCB Remediation in Pittsfield

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Ward 4 Councilor James Conant requested the meeting be held at Herberg Middle School as his ward will be most affected. 

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — U.S. The Environmental Protection Agency and General Electric have a preliminary plan to remediate polychlorinated biphenyls from the city's Rest of River stretch by 2032.

"We're going to implement the remedy, move on, and in five years we can be done with the majority of the issues in Pittsfield," Project Manager Dean Tagliaferro said during a hearing on Wednesday.

"The goal is to restore the (Housatonic) river, make the river an asset. Right now, it's a liability."

The PCB-polluted "Rest of River" stretches nearly 125 miles from the confluence of the East and West Branches of the river in Pittsfield to the end of Reach 16 just before Long Island Sound in Connecticut.  The city's five-mile reach, 5A, goes from the confluence to the wastewater treatment plant and includes river channels, banks, backwaters, and 325 acres of floodplains.

The event was held at Herberg Middle School, as Ward 4 Councilor James Conant wanted to ensure that the residents who will be most affected by the cleanup didn't have to travel far.

Conant emphasized that "nothing is set in actual stone" and it will not be solidified for many months.

In February 2020, the Rest of River settlement agreement that outlines the continued cleanup was signed by the U.S. EPA, GE, the state, the city of Pittsfield, the towns of Lenox, Lee, Stockbridge, Great Barrington, and Sheffield, and other interested parties.

Remediation has been in progress since the 1970s, including 27 cleanups. The remedy settled in 2020 includes the removal of one million cubic yards of contaminated sediment and floodplain soils, an 89 percent reduction of downstream transport of PCBs, an upland disposal facility located near Woods Pond (which has been contested by Southern Berkshire residents) as well as offsite disposal, and the removal of two dams.

The estimated cost is about $576 million and will take about 13 years to complete once construction begins.

For 5A, the entire channel is to be removed and replaced by an engineered cap. This process includes design and material selection, dredging of contaminated sediments, and placement of the cap.

In Pittsfield, there are 32 non-residential exposure areas and 13 residential properties that require remediation to achieve residential standards. Property owners have been notified and GE will negotiate with them for access to implement the cleanup. As well, 48 vernal pools require remediation in 5A.

A conditional approval of the conceptual work plan is staged for 2024 with additional data collection throughout the year. Next year, a final work plan is to be submitted, and a revised final plan ahead of construction beginning in 2026 or 2027.

"We're still in the conceptual design phase," Tagliaferro said. "There's been a lot of work to get to that point."


EPA representatives went into great detail about the transporting of contaminated soils and efforts to prevent the spread of PCBs in the process. GE submitted a first draft of the transportation plan in October and the EPA is still reviewing the plan, anticipating significant revisions including better evaluation of rail transport.

The current version of the plan assumes transport only by trucks, estimating an average of 15 trucks per day to the landfill in Lee and one truck per day to the state landfills. If the rails were used, loading facilities would be required and the EPA directed GE to look at a location off Utility Drive near the wastewater treatment plant.

Attendees had mixed reactions to the plan, some were grateful to see the remediation and others were skeptical of the EPA's methodology.

"I know it sounds terrible that they are going to come in and dredge the river and there's going to be trucks and it's going to be a mess and you don't want it," resident Carolyn Sibner said.

"I just want to remind people in the big picture, the crime and the travesty is not the cleanup it's the fact that GE used our river like a trash can for decades and kind of like cancer or a bad tooth, I think you've just got to grit your teeth and do what you need to do so then the river can heal in this case."

Resident Daniel Miraglia posed concerns for the historical and archaeological context of the river, specifically the Stockbridge Munsee Mohican tribe's relations to Canoe Meadows. He said Unkamet's Crossing has a history of the tribe traveling up the river to Canoe Meadows as its destination point.

Remedial Project Manager Christopher Smith said the EPA has done a series of cultural resource work and this summer, will look at areas of historic and tribal interests and will have to build any findings into the cleanup plan.

"Obviously, there are certain areas that we can't avoid for the cleanup unless there's a reason we really can't clean up like a burial ground, for example.

"When we do work directly with the tribes, they have representatives that we coordinate with, they comment on our work plans. They'll be joining us in the field this summer, most likely when we go out to do that work. So it's definitely a consideration."

Housatonic River Initiative Executive Director Tim Gray wants the team to look into using alternative technologies to destroy the PCBs instead of moving them and has some qualms about the EPA's approach.

"It's not good that you're telling people that it's okay to live in a floodplain, that's ridiculous," he said.

Other attendees seconded his call for alternative technologies and Tagliaferro reported that this has all been litigated in public meetings and in the court system.

"Tim Gray had his opportunity, they appealed, it was upheld in federal court. The remedy is final," he said.


Tags: cleanup,   Housatonic,   PCBs,   Rest of the River,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Superintendant Warns of Prohibited Toy Guns

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The district has been alerted of a concerning trend that is prohibited on school grounds: Orby or Orbeez gel guns.

The toy guns shoot gel or water beads and are said to pose a risk of physical harm and being mistaken for a real firearm. They are a violation of the Pittsfield Public School's code of conduct and could result in a suspension of 11 days or more.

"Though these may appear as simple toys, it's crucial to recognize the potential risks tied to their usage. By raising awareness, we aim to educate our community about the possible hazards associated with these items, emphasizing the importance of informed decision-making and responsible behavior," said Superintendent Joseph Curtis in a memo to the Pittsfield Public School community on Friday.

Last fall, someone used a similar gun to target cross-country students and a coach from Lee High. No one was injured in the incident. 

Given the frequency of school shootings nationwide, Curtis said schools cannot afford to accommodate anything that even remotely that resembles a firearm. The toy guns and gel beads are secured behind a locked case in Walmart on Hubbard Avenue, many indicating that they are for ages 14 and older.

"The Pittsfield Public Schools firmly maintains that Orby toy guns and any associated pellets should not be brought onto school premises, including both indoor and outdoor areas. This directive is in place to ensure the safety and well-being of all students, staff, and visitors within our educational environment," he wrote.

"We stress the significance of following this directive to prevent any potential hazards or disruptions that may arise from the presence of these items on school grounds. By upholding this standard, we aim to cultivate a secure and conducive learning environment for everyone within the Pittsfield community."

The superintendent listed three potential hazards of the water-bead guns in the schools:

  • Physical Injuries: The guns have the capacity to propel projectiles at considerable speeds, posing a risk of injury to the eyes, skin, and even teeth, particularly when fired in close proximity.
     
  • Misidentification Risks: Due to their realistic appearance, some Orby guns may be mistaken for genuine firearms. Such misidentification could result in confusion and potentially perilous encounters, especially if law enforcement or bystanders perceive them as real weapons.
     
  • Public Disruption: The act of firing Orby guns in public settings can be highly disruptive and alarming to others. Such behavior may instill fear and panic among individuals nearby, potentially leading to charges of disorderly conduct or harassment.
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories